Gaan na inhoud

Wikipedia:Robot/Versoeke vir goedkeuring

in Wikipedia, die vrye ensiklopedie
Argief

Na Argief


Hoe word 'n argief aangelê?


Sien gerus Wikipedia:Robot/Goedgekeurde robotte vir suksesvolle versoeke.

Huidige versoeke vir goedkeuring

[wysig bron]

Leaderbot

[wysig bron]

Hi, I'm the operator of meta:Global reminder bot which reminders users when their temporary rights to exist - it is not clear whether authorisation is required for the bot ("Please do not start running your bot before your bot has been approved" on this page but "Robots without a robot flag are allowed to edit, but only if their edits are infrequent (a few per hour)" Wikipedia:Robot#Applications_for_robot_status) but submitting the request anyway. This bot runs on almost all WMF wikis, and has a bot flag on English Wikipedia and Dutch Wikipedia, amongst others. Please ping me in a response. Leaderboard (kontak) 12:00, 7 Maart 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]

Hi @Leaderboard, I see the link to the source code on the bot's userpage. And I see the global edits of the user and am happy with those.
Please could you perform 5 test edits on afwiki, as a final safety check. If the edits go well, we will grant a bot flag for this user on our wiki. Once you have performed the test edits, please link the diffs here, so that I can inspect them. - Rooiratel (kontak) 09:04, 9 Maart 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
@Rooiratel I've turned on the bot, though I don't expect the bot to post for a very long while (if you want it to post now, one option is to give any user any temporary right that is not confirmed, flood or the bot flag that expires in, say, 7 days). Leaderboard (kontak) 11:00, 9 Maart 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Thanks, I'll see if I can apply those changes to a suitable user account. - Rooiratel (kontak) 11:09, 9 Maart 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]

Goedgekeurde versoeke

[wysig bron]

Mr.Ibrahembot

[wysig bron]
  • Robot: Gebruiker:Mr.Ibrahembot
  • Bevelvoerder: Mr. Ibrahem
  • Outomaties of handmatig: outomaties
  • Taal: Python
  • Bronkode: GitHub
  • Funksie: The purpose of this bot to import the image from NC Commons locally and replace this template, Sjabloon:NC, once this is done with a standard image template.
  • Het reeds robotvlag: Nee.

Please note that this is being developed with support from MDWiki:Wiki Project Med Foundation Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:41, 8 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]

Hi @Doc James I am happy to assist with granting your bot flag requests. Please update the link to the source code above. And also once your bot is ready, please do 5 test edits and link them here so that they can be reviewed. - Rooiratel (kontak) 06:01, 8 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Thanks Rooiratel here is the code for review https://github.com/NCCommons/nccbot/tree/main/ncc_core/nc_import Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:03, 8 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Thanks for pushing this @Doc James and thank you @Rooiratel for being so supportive. I want to reiterate how helpful getting this up and running could be for the broader Wiki community. It would unlock literally tens of thousands of South African related media content for use on Wikipedia, in this case, Afrikaans Wikipedia firstly. @Lefcentreright I think you might also be interested in this given the large number of photographs of South African politicians it would release.--Discott (kontak) 12:50, 9 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Thanks @Discott for the support.
@Doc James the code looks good and the developer looks experienced. Please apply at least 5 test edits with this bot, and link them here for review. If all goes well then we can approve the bot flag. - Rooiratel (kontak) 08:34, 10 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Rooiratel Ibrahem gets the error "{'code': 'permissiondenied', 'info': 'The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Outobevestigde gebruikers, Administrateurs, Bevestigde gebruikers.', '*': }" So looks like he needs the flag before he can run tests of the tool Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:39, 14 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Hi, that error doesn't mention a bot flag. It could just be that that page was protected, and since the user hasn't made many edits yet on this wiki, it doesn't fall into any of those groups.
Which page was trying to be edited? In the mean time, try editing other pages, and check that they don't have any page protections enabled. - Rooiratel (kontak) 11:01, 15 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Ah okay. The bot was supposed to edit this page Gebruiker:Doc James Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:03, 15 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Hmm, that page is not protected, so it is weird that it did get that error.
Please do retry on at least 5 different pages. It's okay if it is a normal page. Any issues can be rolled back, these are just test edits. - Rooiratel (kontak) 08:33, 16 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Ibrahem says that the bot needs to be given permission to edit. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:47, 17 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
This is news to me. My understanding is that on all wikis, all new accounts have the same permissions to edit. (Not blocked by default) and so should be able to edit a page without a bot flag.
On enwiki it is normal to do test edits with the bot account before granting it a bot flag.
I am not sure what else to do from here. Has he tried editing more pages with the account? What happens on other wikis where the account doesn't have a bot flag, and he tries to make an edit with that account? - Rooiratel (kontak) 11:22, 17 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
It is not a simple edit it is making, but it is uploading locally images. So the bot needs "upload rights". Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:03, 17 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Ah I was not aware that "upload rights" was a thing. Let me check and get back to you. - Rooiratel (kontak) 08:01, 18 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
So I can't find anything, even on enwiki, to do with "upload rights".
E.g. en:Wikipedia:Uploading_images and en:Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions do not mention such a user right on the mediawiki software.
However I do see it is one of the existing rights in the mediawiki software as listed here : https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:User_rights#List_of_permissions
How to grant it to a specific user, I am still investigating. - Rooiratel (kontak) 08:09, 18 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Upon further reading, that page says that any user in the "users" group has upload rights by default. And that applies to all logged in users.
Checking here : https://af.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spesiaal%3AGebruikersRegte&user=Mr.Ibrahembot
It says that Mr.Ibrahembot is part of the "autoconfirmed users" group, which also has the "upload file" right by default.
So I can only speculate that when you've attempted to do the test edits, the account was not authenticated when you tried to do the edits with this account.
Do you get the same error when you try to upload a file on another wiki? - Rooiratel (kontak) 08:17, 18 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Have asked Ibrahem explain his issue here... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:15, 18 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
I just ran the bot and uploaded 2 files. The problem was with the bot's passwords, which did not include file upload permissions. Mr. Ibrahem (kontak) 06:49, 20 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Excellent and we can see the bot working here[https://af.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gebruikerbespreking%3ADoc_James&diff=2878457&oldid=2877324] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:03, 20 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]

Okay you can see it working here We have set the bot to check every 10 minutes to see if their are images to bring over. Let me know if you want more parameters? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:32, 20 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]

Great, I'm glad you guys figured it out. Looks good so far. Let's do 5 test edits (with different files). If they all go well I will arrange to have the bot flag approved. - Rooiratel (kontak) 11:35, 20 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Worked as it should,, Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:53, 27 Februarie 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Thanks @Doc James I'm happy with these. I will arrange for the bot flag to be applied.
@Oesjaar gee asb. vir @Mr.Ibrahembot die bot-vlag status.
Jy kan dit hier doen (kies die "robot" opsie) : https://af.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spesiaal%3AGebruikersRegte&user=Mr.Ibrahembot
Dankie. - Rooiratel (kontak) 08:59, 9 Maart 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
@Doc James please note, the bot flag has been applied. Dankie @Oesjaar! - Rooiratel (kontak) 09:47, 9 Maart 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]
Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:46, 9 Maart 2026 (UTC)[antwoord]

KabouterBot

[wysig bron]
  • Robot: Gebruiker:KabouterBot
  • Bevelvoerder: Adriaan Joubert (K175)
  • Outomaties of handmatig: outomaties (met oorsig)
  • Taal: Python
  • Bronkode: m:pywikipedia
  • Funksie: Spoor stukkende eksterne skakels op (bediener reageer met 404), kyk of skakel geargiveer is op Wayback Machine, en indien wel, plaas nota op besprekingsblad dat stukkende eksterne skakel vervang kan word met skakel na geargiveerde weergawe.
  • Het reeds robotvlag: Nee.

KabouterBot (kontak) 20:02, 5 Julie 2017 (UTC)[antwoord]


NadzikBOT

[wysig bron]
  • Robot: Gebruiker:NadzikBOT
  • Roboteer: Nadzik
  • Outomaties of handmatig: Semi-outomaties
  • Taal: N.v.t.
  • Bronkode: Standaard AWB
  • Taak: Gaan artikels na vir basiese foute.
  • Huidige botvlag: pl.wiki

Stem

[wysig bron]

User:AlbeROBOT

[wysig bron]

Albertoleoncio (kontak) 16:34, 22 Junie 2020 (UTC)[antwoord]

Stem

[wysig bron]

TolBot (taak 5)

[wysig bron]
  • Robot: TolBot
  • Roboteer (Operator): Tol
  • Outomaties of handmatig (Automatic or manual): outomaties (automatic), daagliks (daily)
  • Taal (Language): Python 3
  • Bronkode (Source code): m:User:TolBot/Task 5#Source
  • Funksie (Function): dateer COVID-19-pandemiedata op (update COVID-19 pandemic data), vervang AlbeROBOT (replace AlbeROBOT)
  • Robotvlag op (Bot flag on): Engelse, Oekraïens, Estlandse, Franse Wikipedias (English, Ukrainian, Estonian, French Wikipedias)

Stem

[wysig bron]

Die bot werk, jy kan dit by Sjabloon:Koronaviruspandemie van 2019-2020/data sien. Dit vervang AlbeROBOT, wat gebreek het as gevolg van 'n verandering aan Engelse Wikipedia se sjabloon. Tol (kontak | bydraes) @ 19:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[antwoord]

Bot status for User:MGA73bot

[wysig bron]

Hello, I am requesting bot status for my bot:

I have made 11 test edits so you can see how it works. --MGA73 (kontak) 21:17, 6 Julie 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

Anyone? User:SpesBona, User:Naudefj or User:Oesjaar perhaps? --MGA73 (kontak) 17:00, 28 Julie 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]
Update the original post is now in Wikipedia:Geselshoekie/Argief2024#GFDL. --MGA73 (kontak) 16:10, 6 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

I suggest also to do license migration like Special:Diff/2688447 (eligible) and Special:Diff/2688446 (not eligible). Should I do some edits with my bot so you can see?

Also would you prefer I edit without a botflag but with 1 minutes between edits so you do not have to give a bot flag? --MGA73 (kontak) 16:45, 6 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

Ondersteun – Pynappel (kontak) 20:02, 6 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]
Ondersteun - Rooiratel (kontak) 08:53, 23 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]
MGA73, to be honest - I am not an expert with Bots and frankly I do not understand whet your Bot want to do. Can you show me an exmaple? Regards. Oesjaar (kontak) 17:50, 20 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]
Gebruiker:Oesjaar Thank you for the fast reply. I would like to make two types of edits.
Right now MediaWiki:Licenses include GFDL as a suggested license. So if anyone upload a file and chose the template {{GFDL}} the license will include disclaimers. To avoid that I would like to remove the disclaimers from the template but it is not possible as long as some files use the template. That is why I would like to change all files to {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}}.
I can do the edits very easy with my bot and I have made more than 1 million edits so I know how to do it. But I need an approval. It makes no difference to me if the bot gets a flag or not. The only difference is that edits will (or can) be hidden from recent changes if the bot has a flag. So it is up to you if you think the edits should be visible in recent changes or not. --MGA73 (kontak) 18:13, 20 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]
But how do I know that what you want to do is legally acceptable? Have you authority from somebody up there in the cloud somewhere to do this? Only asking... Oesjaar (kontak) 18:25, 20 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]
The w:Wikipedia:Licensing update is decided by the Wikimedia Foundation per wmf:Resolution: Licensing update approval. You can see more on m:Licensing update and m:Licensing_update/Questions_and_Answers.
The second part is basicly to rename the template. It is for legal reasons that we can't just remove the disclaimers while the template is in use. Only the copyright holder can remove the disclaimers. So once the template is changed to {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}} the uploader is free to change back to {{GFDL}}.
The same has been done on Commons, English Wikipedia and many other wikis. So there is nothing to worry about. But as you know nothing happens on Wikipedia unless someone decide to do something. And I have decided that I would like to help fix this because it can be really hard to figure out how to do but once you know how it is easy. You can see en:Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MGA73bot 2 as an example. --MGA73 (kontak) 18:39, 20 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

@MGA73: Sorry, but I don't see any need for removing {{GFDL}} or {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}} as long as en:Template:GFDL and en:Template:GFDL-with-disclaimers still exist. They say Existing media is not affected. So why should we on the Afrikaans-Wikipedia act, as they don't need to act? At the end of the day, the Afrikaans-Wikipedia has Billike gebruik like the English Wikipedia has fair use, so we do not need to change anything, because no file needs to be deleted, may it be because of GDFL or something else. For our Billike gebruik, please read Wikipedia:Geselshoekie/Argief2023#Vryheid van panorama, Wikipedia:Geselshoekie/Argief2021#Suid-Afrikaanse rand en Namibiese dollar, Wikipedia:Geselshoekie/Argief2019#Billike gebruik and Wikipedia:Geselshoekie/Argief2008#Billike gebruik. I am Gekant because we do not need to change anything. Groete. --  SpesBona 18:30, 20 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

@SpesBona: The bot will not remove {{GFDL}} or {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}}. It will only rename {{GFDL}} to {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}}. Once the rename is complete I would like to remove the words "Onderhewig aan vrywarings." from {{GFDL}}. It is correct that en:Template:GFDL-with-disclaimers still exist but it is not supposed to be added to new uploads. --MGA73 (kontak) 18:43, 20 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]
@MGA73: Thank you for your offer, but why is there no note on en:Template:GFDL like "This licence is outdated and no longer supported. Please use en:Template:GFDL-with-disclaimers instead." en:Template:GFDL states This template is used on approximately 32,000 pages so is this an old number? What will happen if we do not do anything? No one can delete us any file because of {{GFDL}}. Groete. --  SpesBona 18:50, 20 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

@SpesBona: It is the other way around. Users should NOT use en:Template:GFDL-with-disclaimers. They should use en:Template:GFDL. That is why there is this warning on the GFDL template:

DO NOT EVER ADD "with disclaimers" TO THIS TEMPLATE. SEE en:Wikipedia:GFDL standardization FOR MORE INFORMATION.

The rename is to avoid that users keep uploading files with disclaimers.

Without the rename users can't upload files without adding disclaimers. It will mean it is harder to reuse the files that are uploaded to Wikipedia. --MGA73 (kontak) 19:00, 20 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

I do not think the biggest issue is the license migration but that some of the files seems to be taken from the internet without proof that the files are licensed GFDL. I will generally ignore that for now.
If someone check and delete the files in Kategorie:NouCommons it will probably reduce the number of files to work on. --MGA73 (kontak) 15:07, 25 Augustus 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]
  • Update September 10, 2024: I have now removed the part about license migration. So this is now only about renaming a template. I have never heard about any legal problems related to renaming templates on Wikipedia. The rename will make sure that the copyright for all files is exactly the same as it is now.
After the rename it is possible for the users to relicense their files and remove the disclaimers if they wish to do so. It will also be possible to remove the disclaimers from files copied from other wikis where the files now incorrectly have disclaimers. --MGA73 (kontak) 14:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

Gebruiker:SpesBona It seems that there are no other users that are interessted to Comment on this request. Perhaps you can grant the flag or if you have any more worries explain what the problem is in renaming the license template from GFDL to GFDL-with-disclaimers just like on most other wikis? --MGA73 (kontak) 17:40, 1 Oktober 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

@Oesjaar I trust @MGA73 and agree with the change. We did speak about this on the phone a while back. I'm not sure how to grant a bot flag. Please can someone show me how to do it, I will take responsibility if the changes are disruptive. - Rooiratel (kontak) 18:11, 1 Oktober 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]
I have the authority to do it but have no idea how to! Gebruiker:SpesBona, help us please! Regards. Oesjaar (kontak) 18:16, 1 Oktober 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]
Thank you Rooiratel and Oesjaar. Based on the names on Commons I would expect that if you click on Special:UserRights/MGA73bot you should be able to mark "bot". --MGA73 (kontak) 11:27, 2 Oktober 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

Thank you for the bot flag. I have now fixed the files. --MGA73 (kontak) 15:32, 4 Oktober 2024 (UTC)[antwoord]

Afgekeurde versoeke

[wysig bron]

DangerezBot

[wysig bron]

Kommentaar

[wysig bron]

Ek sal baie graag eers in die sandboks wil eksperimenteer.--MickeyDangerez (kontak) 12:59, 31 Augustus 2017 (UTC)[antwoord]

Stem

[wysig bron]
  • Gekant Mickey, jou spelling is nie goed nie. Ek dink nie dat robotstatus vir jou werk aan spelling 'n goeie idee is nie. (Ek is onseker of robotwerk aan spelling oor die algemeen só hanteer moet word, maar dit is 'n aparte bespreking.) Slyp gerus jou skryfvaardighede en maak seker dat jy op datum is met die AWS en dat jy 'n speltoetser in jou blaaier gebruik. Maar voordat die spelling nie met rasse skrede verbeter nie, sal ek nie hierdie aansoek kan steun nie. Die spelfoute in jou aansoek hierbo is nogal ironies. Ek wil jou ook aanmoedig om net eers meer vertroud te raak met meer aspekte van die projek. Iemand wat 'n robot beheer behoort 'n redelike insig van die naamruimtes, projekkonvensies, wikitaal, ens. te hê. Groete, Alias (kontak) 19:19, 31 Augustus 2017 (UTC)[antwoord]
Ek is wel baie bevoeg met Python-programmering, en wil juis die bot gebruik om my te help met my spelling en ook artikel wat na gegaan moet word vir taal gebruik. Ek het nie toegang tot speltoetser op my blaaier nie. Indien my versoek nie goedgekeur gaan word nie gaan ek nog voort gaan met my ontwikkeling vanaf buite Wikipedia. Ek het bot status benodig om met my bot ontwikkelling te begin en die tegnologie bevorder maar ek word eerder oor my taalgebruik aangevat. Dankie vir jou inset.-MickeyDangerez (kontak) 19:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[antwoord]
Ek wil graag ander aspekte van robotte ook mee eksperimenteer en is nie net gefokus op spelling nie. Dus benodig ek robotstatus vir opvoedkundige doeleindes.--MickeyDangerez (kontak) 19:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[antwoord]
Mickey, 'n robotvlaggie is nie nodig om 'n robot te skryf of te gebruik nie. Min of meer al wat die robotvlaggie doen is om wysigings wat daardie rekening/gebruiker/robot maak op sekere plekke by verstek weg te steek (soos bv. by Spesiaal:Onlangse wysigings). Sover ek weet is daar geen verskille in wat die rekening tegnies gesproke kan doen nie. Die vraag is dus of die wysigings by verstek weggesteek moet word of nie. Ek verstaan jou versoek dus so: jy dink jou wysiging aan spelling (of opvoedkundige eksperimente) moet by verstek versteek word by onlangse wysigings. Ek vertrou nie my eie spelling genoeg om my wysigings te versteek nie. As 'n reël word eintlik omtrent niks versteek nie. Vroeër was robotte algemeen vir interwikiskakels, maar hulle is deesdae nie meer nodig nie. Sover ek weet word dit nou in baie beperkte gevalle gebruik wat baie maklik geoutomatiseer kan word. Die verbetering van spelling kan in baie gevalle nie maklik geoutomatiseer word nie. Ongespesifiseerde eksperimente waarvoor ons nie die kode kan nagaan nie, is volgens my min of meer die definisie van wat ons nie deur 'n robot wil toelaat nie. Mens het nie 'n robot of 'n speltoetser in jou blaaier nodig om jou spelling na te gaan nie - jy kan jou teks in enige program inplak met 'n speltoetser om dit daar na te gaan. Hou in gedagte dat die algemene Afrikaanse speltoetser in Firefox, LibreOffice, Linux-stelsels (en deur pyenchant/Hunspell vir Python) nie briljant is nie - dit ondersteun bv. nie samestellings nie, en kort heelwat woorde. Dit is hoekom mens tog nog maar moet oplet na die spelreëls. Jy voel duidelik geaffronteerd oor baie van die terugvoer hier, en dit word geweldig uitputtend om jou te probeer help. Probeer asb. kritiek sien as 'n manier om jou aan die konvensies hier bloot te stel. (Ek besef alles is nie gedokumenteer nie, en mense stem ook nie noodwendig oor alles saam nie.) --Alias (kontak) 19:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[antwoord]
In daardie geval het my robot nie botstatus nodig nie, ek het net die OK nodig gehad om te mag eksperimenteer vir navorsing en moontlike praktiese gebruike. As ek geaffronteerd voorkom is dit slegs omrede ek gevoel het dat jou gekanting teen my navorsing is en nie geweet dit is spesifiek bedoel tenopsigte van botvlag en versteekde veranderinge nie. Ek verkies dat enige veranderinge aangebring word deur die bot sigbaar moet wees. My robot is anders as normalle robotte, hy gebruik 'n blaaier (Chrome) op die selfde wyse as 'n persoon en gebruik nie die API nie. Hy funksioneer op die vlak van 'n persoon en sal nie buitensporige veranderinge maak indien hy los gelaat word nie, maar op die selfde pas as 'n algemene gebruiker sy take verig. Verder beplan ek nie om enige ingeboude speltoetsers te gebruik nie maar met die hulp van die NCHLT Afrikaans Text Corpora. Soos ek vantevore gese het, vir eers gaan hy net kyk vir basiese spelfoute, vir eers sal ek dat hy net raporteer van enige spelfoute wat 'n persoon dan kan nagaan en dan deur gee of hy moet voortgaan met verandering of dit moontlik vals is or alreeds verander is. Ek sal meer ingligting gee soos ek daaraan werk en vordering maak.--MickeyDangerez (kontak) 22:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[antwoord]
  • Ondersteun. Ek glo die gebruiker sal woorde opsoek voor hy enige vervangings maak :-) Aan die ander kant is dit regtig nie nodig om vir botstatus te wag nie, mits die bot nou nie honderde bladsy gaan wysig nie. Dit help natuurlik ook om eers die bot se doeltreffendheid te demonstreer. Groete. Frank (kontak) 19:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[antwoord]
Baie baie dankie vir jou ondersteuning in my navorsing. Sien asb my boodskap hierbo vir meer inligting oor my beplanning.--MickeyDangerez (kontak) 22:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[antwoord]

Besluit

[wysig bron]
Ontsluit van "https://af.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Robot/Versoeke_vir_goedkeuring&oldid=2884449"