Bespreking:Chris Brink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
in Wikipedia, die vrye ensiklopedie

Stukkende eksterne skakel[wysig bron]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


The web page has been saved by the Internet Archive. Please consider linking to an appropriate archived version: [1]. --RobotJcb (kontak) 15:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[antwoord]

Stukkende eksterne skakel 2[wysig bron]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


The web page has been saved by the Internet Archive. Please consider linking to an appropriate archived version: [2]. --RobotJcb (kontak) 15:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[antwoord]

Stukkende eksterne skakel 3[wysig bron]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


The web page has been saved by the Internet Archive. Please consider linking to an appropriate archived version: [3]. --RobotJcb (kontak) 15:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[antwoord]

Stukkende eksterne skakel 4[wysig bron]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


The web page has been saved by the Internet Archive. Please consider linking to an appropriate archived version: [4]. --RobotJcb (kontak) 15:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[antwoord]

Brink nie 'n filosoof nie[wysig bron]

Ek dink nie dat dit van pas is om Brink as 'n Afrikaanse filosoof te beskou nie. Hy is 'n wiskundige, met 'n bietjie van 'n filosofiese agtergrond. Het hy enige ernstige filosofiese publikasies geproduseer?-- CarlosChio (kontak) 09:21, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[antwoord]

Ongebalanseerd en vol tikfoute[wysig bron]

Maak ek 'n oordeelsfout as die enigste werklike rede vir hierdie Wikipedia inskrywing die triomfantalistiese laaste paragrawe is? Waarom dan so min aandag aan ordentlike taalkundige afronding? Die ideologiese onderrok hang oral uit en dan is dit nog ongewas ook. Verre sy dit van my om 'n apologeet vir Chris Brink te wees maar Wikipedia is nie die plek vir ideologiese speletjies nie.