Wikipediabespreking:Robot

in Wikipedia, die vrye ensiklopedie
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Sien gerus Wikipedia:Robot/Goedgekeurde robotte vir suksesvolle versoeke.

Bot flag requests[wysig bron]

JAnDbot[wysig bron]

Please for bot flag for my bot. It's interwiki bot working on cs:, it does non-controversial automatic interwiki addiction, but his main domain is human assisted problematical interwiki (this operation is working on all languages at same time, but maximal about 20 pages per day).

Sometimes this bot do standard interwiki addiction, but only in the languages with bot flag.

Bot is based on pywikipedia. Already with bot status in about 100 languages, including almost all from top20 (some of them you can see here).

If you have any question, please write it to my discuss page JAnDbot 09:20, 29 Maart 2007 (UTC) / JAn

Indien ek dit nie mis het nie het hierdie robot nog nie robotstatus nie? Buiten vir amper die hele Mei-maand se onnutige datum-interwikis blyk die robot tog nuttige interwikiskakels by te voeg. Veranderings van reeds bestaande skakels blyk ook korrek gedoen te word, soos hierdie hierdie wysiging aandui. Anrie 09:43, 6 Junie 2007 (UTC)
Ek stel voor ons maak 'n uitsondering en ken botstatus aan Jabdbot toe. Dit lyk nie asof dit sommer 'n vent is wat hier rond wil eksperimenteer nie, en ek dink sy bot is heel nuttig.... — Adriaan (SB) 16:40, 4 Oktober 2007 (UTC)
Hy het onlangs 'n aantal wysigings aangebring wat blyk inkorrek te wees. Ek wag nog op 'n antwoord van hom op sy besprekingsblad. Anrie 17:57, 4 Oktober 2007 (UTC)
Oh ok, ek sien - ek het dit nie opgelet nie. — Adriaan (SB) 20:17, 4 Oktober 2007 (UTC)

Not done, the issues mentioned above were apparently never resolved. —Pathoschild 19:23:27, 25 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

K.J.Bot[wysig bron]

Hi! I think that I hit to suitable place. I would like to ask for "+bot" status for User:K.J.Bot. It is interwiki bot working on pywiki engine. He will be working on some Wikipedias.

Thanks, pl:User:Krzysiu Jarzyna 12:35, 6 Desember 2006 (UTC)

Done. —Pathoschild 18:49:59, 24 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

Qualia[wysig bron]

Hallo, I'm running Qualia as an interwiki bot. I would like a bot flag to run my interwiki-bot (using Pywikipedia). This bot will run in manually assisted mode in european languages, updating interwiki-links.

Bot status in the moment: cs, sk, pl, uk, ru, sl, sr, hr, bs, lt, en, de, sv, no, fr, it, pt, da, lb, nds, el, be-x-old Qualia 20:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Done. —Pathoschild 18:54:41, 24 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

TXiKiBoT[wysig bron]

Hello, I'm eu:TXiKi, from the basque wikipedia, and I would like to ask you for a bot flag here to add and correcting interwiki links from and to Afrikaans Wikipedia. I'm an admin user in the basque wikipedia (eu) and I have the bot flag in more than 70 wikipedias. I work with the pywikipedia framework correcting the most linked pages as years, decades, domains, municipalities, etc. This is the full list of the wikipedias where I have a flagged bot: am, an, ast, az, bat-smg, be, bn, bpy, br, bs, ca, co, cs, csb, cv, da, en, eo, es, et, eu, fo, fr, frp, fur, fy, ga, gd, gl, gu, he, hi, ht, hy, is, it, kn, ksh, lb, lij, lmo, ln, mk, mr, na, nah, nap, nds-nl, nl, no, nrm, oc, os, pl, pt, ru-sib, scn, sco, simple, sk, sl, sq, su, sv, ta, te, tet, tg, tr, ur, vec, vi, vls, vo and zh-yue. You can see my contributions here. I can speak in basque, spanish, catalan and english. Thank you. TXiKiBoT 09:30, 20 Maart 2007 (UTC)

  • Diegene wat belangstel kan die bot se goedkeuringsprosesse nagaan by die Engelse Wikipedia en die Nederlandse Wikipedia nagaan (vir wat dit werd is). (Ek het nie die Duitse een kon opspoor nie.)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun - laurens 18:01, 1 Februarie 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun - Anrie 09:37, 4 Februarie 2008 (UTC)

Done. —Pathoschild 18:58:06, 24 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

YonaBot[wysig bron]

Hello, I'm Yonatan, an admin on commons, and I run YonaBot, an interwiki.py pywikipedia bot that adds interwikis mainly from the Hebrew Wikipedia. I already have the bot flag on ar, cs, da, de, en, fr, id, it, no, nl, pl, pt and sv. Thanks, Yonatan 19:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Done. —Pathoschild 19:02:42, 24 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

Loveless[wysig bron]

Hello, I'd like to obtain the bot flag for my robot, Loveless, on this wiki :

thanks in advance :)

Darkoneko 22:57, 29 Mei 2007 (UTC)

Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is a global bot, and this wiki enabled global bots. —Pathoschild 19:04:46, 24 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

BotMultichill[wysig bron]

Let's try this again. Hi, i request a bot bit for BotMultichill.

  • Botmaster : Multichill
  • Bot's name : BotMultichill
  • List of botflags on others wikipedias: ar, bs, ca, ceb, cs, da, de, en, eo, es, et, fr, he, hr, id, is, it, ko, la, li, lt, mr, nap, nds-nl, nl, nn, no, pl, pt, ro, ru, simple, sl, su, sv, ta, te, th, tr, uk & zea
  • Purpose: Interwiki (pywikipedia)
  • Technical details : BotMultichill is an interwiki bot starting at the Dutch wikipedia. The bot uses the pywikipedia framework and runs day and night in autonomous mode. Sometimes the bot will run in manual assisted mode to solve interwiki conflicts. Multichill 08:40, 6 Junie 2007 (UTC)
  • Sy Duitse en Engelse keuringsprosesse het sonder enige kinkels in die kabel afgeloop. Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Anrie 06:20, 4 Maart 2008 (UTC)
  • Ek gaan maar goedkeur om dit van ons af te kry. Ek bly hoofsaaklik teen die toevoeging van ekstra robotte, bloot omdat dit ons tyd mors (goedkeuring, nagaan, administrasie, blok, kommunikasie, ens, ens, ens, ens). (pas weer 'n uur gebruik om deur die aansoek te gaan, besprekings te lees by ander wiki's, gesprek op IRC te hê, ens. Ons moet robotte op 'n manier toelaat, maar op die oomblik voel dit vir my ons dien die robotte in plaas van hulle ons. Enigiemand nog voor/teen? Laaste kans! --Alias 19:44, 4 Maart 2008 (UTC)
Hoor hoor! Ek stem 100% saam - ek is nogal dik daarvoor om vir elke robot te moet gaan uitsnuffel waar hy oorspronklik by ander Wikis genomineer was en dit dan na te gaan en hulle besprekingsbladsye deur te lees vir probleme wat hulle sedert hulle aanvaarding elders opgetel het - en dié besprekingsbladsye is dikwels 'n aanstuur na 'n ander Wikipedia, wat beteken dat jy jou as gaan afsoek voor jy iets relevants kry (en dit irriteer my vreeslik, daarom het ek vandag dit gedoen. Maar ja, ek ondersteun maar waar dit redelik in-die-haak lyk, net om dit weg te kry. Anrie 19:57, 4 Maart 2008 (UTC)
Heeft de laatste kans al lang genoeg geduurd? Multichill 15:40, 14 Maart 2008 (UTC)

Already done. —Pathoschild 19:26:16, 25 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

AlleborgoBot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: Alleborgo
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, in "-autonomous" mode. Sometimes the bot will run in manual assisted mode to solve interwiki conflicts.
  • Programming Language(s): Pywikipedia framework updated daily to the last CVS version
  • Function Summary: interwiki
  • Already has a bot flag in: it, cs, da, de, en, eo, es, fr, id, ja, ka, nl, pl, pt, ru, sv, zh, zh-yue. On it.wiki has done more than 31000 edit.

Thanks --AlleborgoBot 16:05, 14 Junie 2007 (UTC)

Huidiglik word daar aan geen robotte meer botstatus verleen nie. Effektiewelik afgekeur. Anrie 12:04, 28 Junie 2007 (UTC)
Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is a global bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots. —Pathoschild 19:29:00, 25 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

Byrialbot[wysig bron]

Hello! I ask for permission to run my interwiki bot Byrialbot at this wiki, and get a bot flag for it.

  • Operator: Gebruiker:Byrial
  • Operator's home project: da:User:Byrial
  • Purpose: Interwiki
  • Have bot flag at: als:, ar:, bn:, bs:, bpy:, ca:, ceb:, cs:, da:, de:, en:, eo:, et:, fo:, fr:, he:, hu:, id:, io:, is:, it:, ka:, ksh:, lb:, li:, lt:, lv:, mk:, ms:, nds:, nl:, nn:, no:, pms:, pt:, ru:, simple:, sk:, sl:, sr:, sv:, th:, uk:, vo:
  • Details: Interwiki using Pywikipediabot starting from da:, nn:, no: and sv:. It mostly runs manually assisted and I try to solve found interwiki conflicts when I can.

It is not running yet. Please tell if you like to see any test edits. Thank you! Byrial 13:28, 26 Junie 2007 (UTC)

Huidiglik word daar aan geen robotte meer botstatus verleen nie. Effektiewelik afgekeur. Anrie 12:04, 28 Junie 2007 (UTC)
Done. (Now that this wiki implemented the standard bot policy, I assume the older decision not to accept more bot flags no longer applies. Let me know if this is incorrect.) —Pathoschild 14:33:41, 31 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

Idioma-bot[wysig bron]

I ask for bot flag to Gebruiker:Idioma-bot at this wiki.

  • Operator: lt:User:Hugo.arg
  • Purpose: Interwiki
  • Have bot flag at: more than 60 wikipedias (en,fr,nl,de,es,pt,pl,zh,ja...)
  • Details: Interwiki using Pywikipediabot. Works in autonomous and manual modes.

lt:User:Hugo.arg 14:30, 2 Januarie 2008 (UTC)

Diegene wat belangstel kan die robot se Engelse en Nederlandse keuringsprosesse nagaan.

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun - laurens 18:02, 1 Februarie 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun - Anrie 06:09, 19 Februarie 2008 (UTC)
Maybe you can give the flag to my bot and unblock it? I have no idea that the problems is. Idioma-bot here worked long time and nobody has any objections about it work. If you don't want that it would flood RC page just give bot status then. Hugo.arg (kontak) 11:51, 20 Junie 2008 (UTC)
This is now a global bot (and this wiki enabled global bots), so a local bot flag is no longer needed. The bot has already been unblocked. —Pathoschild 19:07:47, 24 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

Ken123BOT[wysig bron]

Hierdie is 'n bot, en het nog nie bot status verkry nie. Adriaan ( SpreekBydraes ) ♪♫ 20:03, 29 Junie 2007 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun botstatus - laurens 18:08, 1 Februarie 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Gekant - die ou moet darem vir ons kom vertel wat hy van plan is om te doen voor ons hom goedkeur. Anrie 09:07, 7 Februarie 2008 (UTC)
Na die stok ou boodskap op sy gebruikersblad weet nie ek wat hom sal aanspoor om so iets te doen nie: "Until further notice is given, no further bots will be approved. The general consensus is that the number of active bots (about 9 - total of 20 approved bots), compared to the number of articles (9 231) and the number of active and semi-active users (about 20-30) is more than sufficient. We will notify you if and when the situation changes. Thank you. Anrie 10:31, 11 Julie 2007 (UTC)" laurens 06:55, 17 Februarie 2008 (UTC)

Not done, no response from the requester. —Pathoschild 14:37:10, 31 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

Purbo T[wysig bron]

I'd like to request a bot flag for interwiki bot Purbo_T.

The correct place to ask would be Wikipediabespreking:Robot. Please note that it might take a while to get your request granted/denied. Anrie 10:36, 4 Februarie 2008 (UTC)
  • no problem. Meanwhile, the bot is doing a decent number of (manual assisted) test edits, if you do not mind. --Purodha 13:11, 4 Februarie 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun - Ek het die robot se gedrag na gegaan en is van mening dat dit nuttige werk doen - meestal byvoeg, aanpas en so hier en daar verwydering van stukkende interwikiskakels. laurens 06:51, 17 Februarie 2008 (UTC)

Already done. —Pathoschild 19:09:37, 24 Augustus 2009 (UTC)

Alecs.bot[wysig bron]

I'd like to request a bot flag for interwiki bot Alecs.bot.

Thank you! -- Alecs.y 13:23, 17 Februarie 2008 (UTC)

I asked the bot owner to follow up. —Pathoschild 18:55:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Alecs.bot has worked a few days under my supervision, so you can judge the quality of his work. Thank you! Alecs.y (kontak) 22:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Done. —Pathoschild 16:12:08, 01 April 2011 (UTC)

SoxBot[wysig bron]

Hello! I'm Soxred93 from English edition of Wikipedia. I'm asking to give my bot a bot flag, then I'll update interwiki links, I'll scan English Wikipedia always. If it done or if there are any questions about it, please tell me in my English talk page. Thank you!

done. —Pathoschild 13:27:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

EivindBot[wysig bron]

  • Contributions
  • Operator: EivindJ
  • Programming language: Pywikipedia
  • Function: interwiki, syntax-fix, HTML to wiki syntax, fixing redirects in articles, double redirect fixing
  • Already has flag on: no.wiki and sv.wiki, trial editing at nl.wiki, da.wiki, nn.wiki and en.wiki
  • Description: Will only do interwiki if not Anrie or anyone else want me to do syntax-fixing etc. Whatever you guys like :)

--EivindJ (kontak) 21:00, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is a global bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots. (You'll need a local bot flag to perform non-interwikilinking tasks, but it doesn't seem to have done any in the 17 months since this request.) —Pathoschild 03:43:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

SpBot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: de:User:Euku
  • Function: interwiki links
  • Software: pywikipediabot framework
  • Already has bot flag on: 61 Wikipedias, for example: ar, bn, ca, cs, de, en, es, eu, da, fr, he, hu, it, pl, ro, ru, sq, tr. (Since 2006 on German Wikipedia, with >67.000 edits), look at details
Thank you --SpBot (kontak) 22:12, 7 Mei 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking. af-WP is now on my ignore-list. Leave a message on my talk page, when you have changed you bot policy and someone clicks here by mistake. --Euku 12:45, 8 Junie 2008 (UTC)
Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is a global bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots. (The bot has since been unblocked.) —Pathoschild 03:44:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

MelancholieBot (global bot)[wysig bron]

Thank you --Melancholie (kontak) 06:47, 15 Mei 2008 (UTC)

Please unblock my bot, if flag should be granted. --- Sorry for that, Melancholie (kontak) 14:15, 22 Mei 2008 (UTC)
This (trusted) bot now is a global bot (thus won't flood your RecentChanges anymore); please unblock it. --- Best regards, Melancholie (kontak) 22:54, 11 Desember 2008 (UTC)
The bot has since been unblocked. —Pathoschild 03:46:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is a global bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots. —Pathoschild 03:46:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

FiriBot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: ro:User:Firilacroco
  • Function: interwiki
  • Operation: Automatic Daily
  • Software: pywikipedia framework
  • Already has bot flag on: ro, en, fr, de, es, la, simple, uk, nn, sr, ru, bn, sv, ar, bs, lb, cs, mi, nl, sq, bg, ko, ka, tr, vec, ia, dv
  • Please unblock my bot if the bot will get bot flag. Thank you!--Firilacroco (kontak) 14:44, 4 Junie 2008 (UTC)
Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is a global bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots.. —Pathoschild 03:47:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

StigBot[wysig bron]

I hereby request botflag on this wiki for my bot StigBot.

  • Owner’s account: Stigmj (talk)
  • Bot account: StigBot (contribssulmakebot )
  • Function: mainly interwiki, but can be used in user-namespace for adding userpages etc. on request from the affected users.
  • Software: Pywikipedia, updated from SVN before each run.
  • Other: Runs manually initiated automatic supervised and sometimes entirely manual. Already has bot flag on: ar, bpy, en, eo, fr, no, oc, pt, simple, ro, udm and vo.

Best regards, Stigmj (kontak) 12:23, 10 Junie 2008 (UTC)

Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is a global bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots. —Pathoschild 03:47:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Rekenaar (now タチコマ robot)[wysig bron]

  • Bot operator: User:White Cat (Commons:User:White Cat) - En-N, Tr-4, Ja-1
  • List of botflags on other projects: Bot has a flag on wikimedia (meta,commons) wikipedia (ar, az, de, en, es, et, fr, is, ja, ku, nn, no, ru, sr, tr, uz, simple) (See: m:User:White Cat#Bots)
  • Purpose: Interwiki linking, double redirect fixing, commons delinking (for cases where commonsdelinker fails)

-- Cat chi? 15:10, 17 Mei 2008 (UTC)

Not done; inactive bot, indefinitely blocked on this wiki. —Pathoschild 03:53:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Could my bot be unblocked? It is hardly inactive and has a global bot flag now. Furthermore I would like to request a local bot flag as well. -- Cat chi? 13:59, 25 Desember 2011 (UTC)

FiriBot[wysig bron]

Operator: Firilacroco

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): Python (using Pywikipedia framework)

Function Summary: Adds/modifies/removes interwiki links

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily

Edit rate requested: 2-3 edits per minute

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): ro, en, fr, de, es, la, simple, uk, nn, sr, ru, bn, sv, ar, bs, lb, cs, mi, nl, sq, bg, ko, ka, tr, vec, ia, dv

Function Details: It adds/removes or modifies interwiki links and corrects double redirecting pages.

And please unblock my bot after it gets the flag. Thank you in advance! --Firilacroco (kontak) 04:26, 6 Junie 2008 (UTC)

I seriously don't agree with the robot, i think it's just a sign of pure lazyness (in my opinion) , im sorry but i just don't like non-humans doing human jobs , it just doesn't feel right and kinda feels like cheating , im sorry but im a big NO with bots and my reason is simple, i dont think it's nessesary. Afrikaans wikipedia doesn't even have the slightest bit of vandalism, and the small amount of vandalism that does happen, is reversable.--Bezuidenhout (kontak) 19:47, 11 Junie 2008 (UTC)
  • I will try to explain why this and other interwiki bots should do their job here. Every 1 second there is a new article created, that could be a translation of an article that is writen here in afrikaans. To find that article it is nice have a interwiki link added to the afrikaanse article here. You can do that my hand and ssy that is a human job, but with the limited human editors around here. I think that job can be better done by interwiki bots. I'm working on interwiki links and I have done it by hand, but I can only add one checked link to each article. Most of the time is a dutch article, because afrikaans and dutch look the same. But I can't check all the other interwiki links. There are 100+ possible other wikipedia's in 100 other languages that could have a translation of that article.
  • On your second remark an interwiki bot or this interwiki bot will not do any counter vandalism work. For that you need only one bot that is manual controlled in the hands of an afrikaan speaking admin of an afrikaan speaking bureaucrate.
  • If your no against bots is so big I think you should start a discussion to remove the bots flags of all the bots here. But more then 100 edits per day are made by bots and it a lot of work to that by hand.
Carsrac (kontak) 07:43, 12 Junie 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for support Carsrac. Look everywhere, in any other languages - there are interwiki bots which adds links to other wikis. If you would like to do this by hand, that's not a problem for me. I'll delete the line with this wiki from the configuration and you won't have my bot's help.
For example - look in the left side. There are interwiki links. This links were put here by bots! --Firilacroco (kontak) 10:25, 12 Junie 2008 (UTC)
With now 256 Wikipedias, you'll have to make 255 edits for each more common item that you add somewhere. It took me all the normal working hours (on a holiday) to add "zaterdag", or something like that, to about 150 Wikipedias, then stopped because my familiy demanded me, too. I never came back to this boring task, since on the next holiday, nice robots had done all the remaining work for me, and I hardly believe, I had completed myself. It is impractical to rely on mens powers to do this labour. Beter each Wikipedia needs at least one robot to export its links, and all other wikipedias must axept them. If only one single one does not allow one single bot, the work needs to be done by another bot, and each request to the servers for it is at least duplicated one time. --77.9.92.200 14:35, 15 Junie 2008 (UTC)

Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is a global bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots.. —Pathoschild 04:01:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Naudefjbot[wysig bron]

Kan julle asseblief vir die gebruiker bot-status gee?

Operateur: Gebruiker:Naudefj

Outomaties of handmatig: Handmatig (om seker te maak die ding maak nie droog nie).

Programmeringstaal: Python (Pywikipedia, selfde as meeste ander robotte).

Funksie: Opdateer interwiki skakels (sal later ook vir ander onderhoudstake gebruik word).

Periode: Weekliks (lae frekwensie).

Het reeds bot-status: Ja, op en.wp en nl.wp.

Funksie details: Skryf af.wp interwiki skakels uit na ander projekte soos nl.wp. In die proses sal af.wp ook opgedateer word as interwiki skakels hier verouderd/ verkeerd is.

Groete. Frank (kontak) 16:59, 29 Junie 2008 (UTC)

This bot seems to be inactive on all wikis. —Pathoschild 18:43:02, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiDreamer Bot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: WikiDreamer
  • Purpose: Interwiki from French Wikipedia
  • Software: Pywikipedia framework
  • Already has bot flag on: 68 wikipedias, more infos here
I start my bot now for 50 test edits. Thanks! --WikiDreamer (kontak) 23:53, 21 Julie 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun - Die robot hersien interwiki skakels soos enige van die ander robotte hier. Aangesien die robot heelwat wysigings maak, stel ek voor ons gee hom bot-status. Groete. Frank (kontak) 07:04, 26 Julie 2008 (UTC)
Done. —Pathoschild 04:49:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Kwjbot[wysig bron]

Thank you!--Kwj2772 03:18, 4 Augustus 2008 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Word reeds op meeste ander Wikipedias toegelaat. Frank (kontak) 05:36, 4 Augustus 2008 (UTC)
done. —Pathoschild 13:28:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Ptbotgourou[wysig bron]

  • Operator: Gdgourou
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, in "-autonomous" mode for interwiki and a manual bot's user page update..
  • Programming Language(s): Pywikipedia framework updated daily with SVN
  • Function Summary: interwiki
  • Already has a bot flag in: ar, Commons, Simple, da, de, en, es, fi, fr, he, hr, hu, it, ja, nl, no, pt, sv. List (43 wikis)

Thanks --Gdgourou (kontak) 18:16, 4 Augustus 2008 (UTC)

Add 4 more wikis (ar,da, es,pt) --Gdgourou (kontak) 22:47, 7 Augustus 2008 (UTC)--Gdgourou (kontak) 08:58, 21 Augustus 2008 (UTC)
No more news ? --Gdgourou (kontak) 23:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Standaard interwiki opdaterings op groot skaal. Frank (kontak) 05:42, 5 Augustus 2008 (UTC)
Done. —Pathoschild 13:30:34, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

LaaknorBot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: no:User:Laaknor
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted: Mostly automatic
  • Programming Language(s): Pywikipedia, updated from SVN before each run
  • Function Summary: interwiki, mostly from nordic countries
  • Already has a bot flag in: global bot, ar,ca,da,de,en,fi,fr,is,it,ja,lt,nl,nn,no,pl,pt,ru,sv + several wikiquotes

Thank you Laaknor (kontak) 18:02, 11 Augustus 2008 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. / Jeg støtter forslaget fullt ut. --Voyageur (kontak) 18:29, 11 Augustus 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Groete. Frank (kontak) 19:00, 11 Augustus 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun, natuurlik. Ek het baie goeie ervaring met hom op no.wiki! --Eivind (kontak) 20:10, 11 Augustus 2008 (UTC)
Done. —Pathoschild 13:31:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Luckas-bot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: Luckas Blade
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted: Mostly automatic
  • Programming Language(s): Pywikipedia
  • Function Summary: interwiki
  • Already has a bot flag in: 43 wikis

Thanks. Luckas Blade (kontak) 21:00, 18 Augustus 2008 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Groete. Frank (kontak) 19:48, 30 Augustus 2008 (UTC)
Done. —Pathoschild 13:32:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

CarsracBot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: Carsrac
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted: Mostly automatic
  • Programming Language(s): Pywikipedia
  • Function Summary: interwiki
  • Already has a bot flag in: 43 wikis

Thanks. Carsrac (kontak) 10:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Groete. Frank (kontak) 10:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
done. —Pathoschild 13:32:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

GnawnBot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: StormDaebak
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted: Mostly automatic, manually assisted if needed
  • Programming Language(s): Pywikipedia
  • Function Summary: interwiki
  • Already has a bot flag in: ar, bs, ca, cs, da, de, en, es, fi, fr, he, hu, ko, ku, mk, nl, nn, pt, ro, ru, sh, sl, tr, vi (24 flags, confirm here)

Thanks. StormDaebak (kontak) 21:44, 22 Desember 2008 (UTC)

Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is a global bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots. —Pathoschild 13:33:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

HerculeBot[wysig bron]

Hello, I am Hercule, from the french wikipedia.

I request bot flag for User:HerculeBot. It's a bot written in Java (Using MediaWikiBot API for Java). I use it since long time on french wikipedia (about 400 000 edits there).

I make frequent renaming of categories in fr, and so added a module to fix interwikis during the category change process. That's for this module that I ask for bot status.

The algorithm of the code I want to run here is :

Look for interwikis on a (manually) specified renamed page.
If the interwiki include a #
Display a message on the supervisor console (I'll solve the interwiki manually if needed)
Else
For each interwiki page
If the page is a redirect
Display a message on supervisor console (I'll verify manually the page)
else
Search the interwiki for the base page (for exemple in launched from fr, look for [[fr:*]]
If interwiki is founded,
If this interwiki if different from the new name
Update interwiki, and display comment on the supervisor console
End if
Else
Display a message (I'll go manually to look at the page)
End if
end if
End for
End if

As you can see the code is very simple (no automatic fixing of redirect, no add of new interwikis). The advantage for the af communauty is that the interwikis from fr (where pages have content, or categories are pertinents) are updated quickly. So a af user wanting to find info in french to improve an article finds the good page or category ;)

Remark : current edits are made from many different wikipedias because I need to make about 50 edits on small wikipedias. So I try to find interwikis to update. In normal use interwikis will be from fr (or wuu sometimes), and rarely from other wikipedias (it can occurs if I find a wrong interwiki during renaming).

Project : as I'm a sysop on wuu wikipedia, it's possible I add a removing module, that would be manually lanched before I delete a page.

Extra : If you need so, I have a module to solve double redirects that I can run here. But only if it's requested by your communauty.

Other flags : You can find details of my flags here (fr, wuu, en, de, pt, sv, ru, eo, sq, tt, lv, ml, mi and cs). The monitoring of current request is visible here. As it's permitted and my frequency of editing is low, I'll continue to work here. If I need to stop just tell it to me on my french talk page. I would then disable code for afwiki.

Thank you for your attention, feel free to ask details.

Regards --Hercule (kontak) 12:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Ek het die bot se veranderinge nagegaan en stel voor dat 'n bot-vlag toegeken word. Groete. Frank (kontak) 02:39, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

HerculeBot is a global bot since today. --Hercule (kontak) 07:57, 3 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

done. —Pathoschild 13:37:55, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

GhalyBot[wysig bron]

I would like to submit this request to have a bot flag for GhalyBot. Its technical information is summarized below.

  • Operator: Ghaly
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted: automatic
  • Programming Language(s): pywikipedia
  • Function Summary: interwiki links
  • Already has a bot flag on: Global and on  ;En,arz, Simple, de , da, pt, es, et, fr, nl, zh, sv, bs, ja, it, ar, cy ,vo, cs, hu, , fi, ka, sr, sl, id, th, wuu, mk, ml, he, ca, ru, pl, nn. Thanks .--Ghaly (kontak) 13:33, 31 Januarie 2009 (UTC)
Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is a global bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots. —Pathoschild 13:40:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Rubinbot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: Rubin16
  • Technical details: pywikipediabot
  • Functions: interwiki
  • Already has flags on: ru.wiki, uk.wiki, be.wiki, tt.wiki, zh-yue.wiki, yi.wiki, en.wiki, wa.wiki, sq.wiki, vec.wiki, sv.wiki

I can perform test edits if needed Rubin16 (kontak) 15:53, 12 Februarie 2009 (UTC)

Done by Meta request Rubin16 (kontak) 16:39, 6 Maart 2009 (UTC)

Darkicebot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: simple:User:Razorflame
  • Function: interwiki
  • Operation: automatic as long as I am on, which is usually between 4 and 12 hours.
  • Software: standard pywikipediabot updated daily.
  • Has bot flags on:simple, it, es, fr, az, en, de, pt, bs, vec, ca, sv, vo, uk, ru, az, ar, ku, he, nl, hu, fi, eo, sk, ja, gl, vi, zh, pl, oc, id, an, jv, sr, cy, lb, mt, an

This bot will be making anywheres between 4 and 12 edits per minute. If you require any test edits or if you grant or deny the flag, please contact me on my talk page over on Simple English Wikipedia: simple:User talk:Razorflame. Thank you!

Links to en, de, nl approved bits
Will complete this in a second, need to get the boilerplate from the bot page. Darkicebot (kontak) 01:50, 18 Februarie 2009 (UTC)
Done. —Pathoschild 13:49:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

TechBot[wysig bron]

I would like to submit this request to have a bot flag for TechBot. Its technical information is summarized below.

  • Operator: Techman224
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted: automatic
  • Programming Language(s): pywikipedia
  • Function Summary: interwiki links
  • Already has a bot flag on: here

This bot has been blocked, and I request it to be unblocked. Thanks. Techman224 (kontak) 21:56, 22 Maart 2009 (UTC)

Already done, and the block has since expired. —Pathoschild 14:43:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Purbo T[wysig bron]

This is a request for a bot flag for interwiki bot Purbo_T.

This bot has been blocked, and I request it to be unblocked. Thank you. --Purodha (kontak) 12:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Have you requested global botstatus for your bot, Purodha? Anrie (kontak) 10:00, 1 Mei 2009 (UTC)
Not currently. --93.131.56.79 23:27, 7 Mei 2009 (UTC)
Already done. —Pathoschild 14:45:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

AmphBot[wysig bron]

  • Contributions: contributions on af wp
  • Operator: hiNt (main wiki where I works: Хинт)
  • Programming language: Pywikipedia (Python)
  • List of bot flags on other wikipedias: ru, en, pl, simple, uk, bg, sr, be-x-old, zh, ja, sw (bot flags on other wikis)
  • Pending flag at: be, tpi, hu, ar, ka, sl, sk, mk, eu, sh, io, ga
  • Purpose: maintain interwiki links and fix double redirects

Thank you. — hiNt (kontak) 09:41, 12 Junie 2009 (UTC)

Already done. —Pathoschild 14:46:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

BOTijo[wysig bron]

Thanks. Regards. --Emijrp (kontak) 10:36, 28 Junie 2009 (UTC)

Done. —Pathoschild 23:12:30, 02 April 2011 (UTC)

Rameshngbot[wysig bron]

  • Bot : - Rameshngbot
  • Bot User: -Rameshng and Home Wiki User Page User Rameshng . I am an active wikian and admin in ml wiki. if needed to contact immedietly you can leave message on my Home wiki Talk page.
  • Purpose:-I would like to run the bot for only interwiki links. Other bot flags on en, ar,bn, de, ml, simple, zh-yue wikipedias
  • Frequency:-Once in day or two
  • Details: - This is using pywiki and using the latest interwiki.py for creating interwiki links.

—unsigned by Rameshng 07:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

I asked the bot owner to follow up. —Pathoschild 18:57:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for reminding me. I m still running the interwiki. Please approve a bot flag. --Rameshng (kontak) 18:58, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Not done; the bot has not made any edits on this wiki yet, and appears to be inactive. —Pathoschild 23:22:19, 02 April 2011 (UTC)

FoxBot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: Foxie001
  • Purpose: interwiki fix/Add
  • Programming Languages: Python, Pywikipedia
  • Already has bot flag on: 25 wiki's and global bot flag SUL
  • Contributions

Thanks in advance Foxie001 (kontak) 11:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Not done; this is a global bot, and this wiki enabled global bots. —Pathoschild 20:42:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

MerlLinkBot[wysig bron]

  • Operator: Merlissimo
  • Purpose:
    • main task: changes external links which are outdated and can be successfully replaced by a new one.
    • side job: interwikis, but only supervised on single sites (done by py)
  • Programming Languages: Java (own framework
  • Already has bot flag on: dewiki(home),ar,be-x-old,bn,bs,ca,cs,da,en,es,fr,he,hr,hu,it,ja,ksh,lt,ms,nl,nn,no,pl,pt,ro,ru,sh,sr,sv,sw,zh,commons,simple and some more requested (see all flags)
  • Contributions
  • Function Details:
The bot replaces urls that have to be changed. This can be only a domain change or a more complex page structure change on a website. Links are dectected with the help of the api (and not with regex) and are only replaced if the webserver of the new url returns a 200-status-response for that new resource. “Link text” is not changed. (own framework written in java - used by all of my bots)

Could sb. please help me to localize the edit summary of my bot for af? I have described the four possible edit summaries at Gebruikerbespreking:MerlLinkBot. Merlissimo (kontak) 14:36, 2 Oktober 2009 (UTC)

This bot is not eligible for automatic approval (see requirements). I asked one of the local bureaucrats, RAM, to take a look. —Pathoschild 23:44:00, 02 April 2011 (UTC)

LucienBOT[wysig bron]

  • Operator: m:User:Lucien leGrey
  • Function: interwiki fix/add. Double and broken redirects.
  • Operation: automatic.
  • Software: standard pywikipediabot updated daily via SVN.
  • Has bot flags on:es, it, ca, fr, ar, en, de, pt, bs, gl, ca, sv, ru, ext, la, ar, nl, ja, fi, eo, an, lad, cbk-zam, pl... Almost 30 Wikipedias (See es:Usuario:LucienBOT/Matriz).

If you require any test edits or if you grant or deny the flag, please let me know. Thank you in advance! --Lucien leGrey (kontak) 10:30, 14 Oktober 2009 (UTC)

Already done. Manuelt15 (kontak) 21:30, 19 Maart 2011 (UTC)

MWBot[wysig bron]

Thanks in advance. --MisterWiki (kontak) 21:29, 15 Februarie 2010 (UTC)

Comment Operator is indefinately blocked on en.wiki. Bot was blocked on simple.wiki for continuing to edit after bot request denied. -Djsasso (kontak) 23:55, 15 Februarie 2010 (UTC)
Since the bot is not active on this wiki and has several blocks on other wikis, this request should be handled by a local bureaucrat; I've asked RAM to take a look. —Pathoschild 23:59:35, 02 April 2011 (UTC)

RobotQuistnix[wysig bron]

  • Operator: nl:Gebruiker:Quistnix
  • Function: interwiki fix/add
  • Operation: automatic, sometimes user-attended. Round-robin change of wiki to work from.
  • Software: standard pywikipediabot
  • Has bot flags on: ca, da, de, es, fr, fy, id, it, lb, li, nap, nl, nds-nl, pt, ro, sk

Operator speaks nl, en, de, fr and some es. -- Quistnix (kontak) 10:52, 28 Februarie 2010 (UTC)

  • Comment

This bot already have Global Bot flag. Manuelt15 (kontak) 21:29, 19 Maart 2011 (UTC)

Egmontbot[wysig bron]

Thank you, kind regards --Egmontaz (kontak) 11:16, 6 Maart 2010 (UTC)

Already done. Manuelt15 (kontak) 21:29, 19 Maart 2011 (UTC)

Kgsbot[wysig bron]

  • Bot : - Kgsbot
  • Bot User: -Kiran Gopi and Home Wiki User Page User Kiran Gopi . I am an active wikian and in ml wiki. if needed to contact immedietly you can leave message on my Home wiki Talk page.
  • Purpose:-I would like to run the bot for only interwiki links. Other bot flags on ml, lmo wikipedias
  • Frequency:-Once in day or two
  • Details: - This is using pywiki and using the latest interwiki.py for creating interwiki links.

Many Thanks Kiran Gopi (kontak) 09:05, 7 Julie 2010 (UTC)

Done. —Pathoschild 00:15:40, 03 April 2011 (UTC)

WikitanvirBot[wysig bron]

  • 1. Operator  : Wikitanvir
  • 2. Automatic or Manually Assisted : Automatic
  • 3. Programming Language(s)  : Python (pywikipedia)
  • 4. Function Summary  : Interwiki
  • 5. Edit period(s)  : Daily
  • 6. Edit rate requested  : 2/3 edits per minute at most
  • 7. Already has a bot flag (Y/N)  : Yes, see here
  • 8. Function Details  : Bot will patrol recent changes and new pages, and add, remove, or modify interwiki links in autonomous mode.

Currently doing some test edits. Notify me if there is a problem. — Tanvir 11:56, 1 Oktober 2010 (UTC)

It is oke with me. Ik heb geen problemen met deze bot. I have see that you have posted a request on meta, but it is not wise let it do by a local admin or wait on your global bot flag? Carsrac (kontak) 09:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Done. --mav

TjBot[wysig bron]

I request a bot flag for TjBot

.. Contributions in all Wikimedia projects see here. Flags and edit counter in other projects see here.

— Tjmoel Icons-flag-id.png bicara 17:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

This bot have Global Bot flag. Manuelt15 (kontak) 21:27, 19 Maart 2011 (UTC)

Ebrambot[wysig bron]

Hi, I want request bot flag for Ebrambot. I have flag on ar, arz, az, be_x_old, bs, ca, ckb, cs, da, de, en, es, fa, fi, fr, he, id, ja, nl, nn, pt, ru, sv, sw, tr, zh for doing interwiki. thanks.Ebraminio (kontak) 04:27, 20 Oktober 2010 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Bestaande robot wat reeds op ander Wikipedias vertrou word. Keur asb. goed. Groete. Anoniem

This bot have "Global Bot" flag. Manuelt15 (kontak) 21:25, 19 Maart 2011 (UTC)

Mjbmrbot[wysig bron]

  • Operator  : Mjbmr
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted : Automatic
  • Programming Language(s)  : Python (pywikipedia)
  • Function Summary  : Interwiki
  • Already has a bot flag (Y/N)  : Yes, see here
  • Function Details  : Just interwikis, thank Mjbmr Talk 11:43, 7 Desember 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Bestaande robot wat reeds op ander Wikipedias vertrou word. Keur asb. goed. Groete. Anoniem
Bot now have "Global Bot" flag. Manuelt15 (kontak) 21:25, 19 Maart 2011 (UTC)

DEagleBot[wysig bron]

  • Operator  : Dark Eagle
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted : Automatic
  • Programming Language(s)  : Python (pywikipedia)
  • Function Summary  : Interwiki
  • Already has a bot flag (Y/N)  : Yes, see here
  • Function Details  : interwikis

Please give flag for my bot, it's iw bot from lv.wp. Tahnks! =) --Dark Eagle (kontak) 17:02, 31 Januarie 2011 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Bestaande robot wat reeds op ander Wikipedias vertrou word. Keur asb. goed. Groete. Anoniem
Done per automatic approval. Manuelt15 (kontak) 21:23, 19 Maart 2011 (UTC)

Ripchip Bot[wysig bron]

Thanks in advance. Béria Lima msg 19:42, 2 Maart 2011 (UTC)

Already done. Manuelt15 (kontak) 21:15, 19 Maart 2011 (UTC)

CocuBot[wysig bron]

  • Contributions: contributions on af wp
  • Operator: Cocu (main wiki: no.wikipedia)
  • Programming language: Pywikipedia (Python)
  • List of bot flags on other wikipedias: 44 wikis
  • Request on major wikis: en, de, nl, fr and it.
  • Pending flag at: 15-20 wikis
  • Purpose: maintain interwiki links.

Thanks in advance. --Cocu (kontak) 15:15, 5 Junie 2011 (UTC)

Congrats on receiving global bot status. Best regards. Anoniem

PixelBot[wysig bron]

PixelBot (kontak) 21:20, 10 Julie 2011 (UTC)

HiW-Bot[wysig bron]

  • Operator  : Hedwig in Washington
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted : automatic
  • Programming Language(s)  : Python (pywikipedia), daily update
  • Function Summary  : Interwiki, Internationalization by removing chaos in Babel so it can be used properly and easy. Double redirects will be added shortly
  • Already has a bot flag (Y/N)  : Yes, DE, EN, AR, NN and LB, others pending see here
  • Function Details  : just using the standard interwiki.py; parameters: -auto -all - log -catr, no experiments!
  • Willing to assist with other tasks, if possible.

--Hedwig in Washington (kontak) 06:14, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

* Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Toetswysigings lyk goed. Die robot kan goedgekeur word. Groete. Anoniem
Done. Per automatic approval requested at meta. --MarcoAurelio (kontak) 13:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Bot is retired. Please remove the bot flag, if possible please protect the user and talk page as well. Thanks for letting me use the bot here! :) --Hedwig in Washington (kontak) 06:45, 7 Augustus 2014 (UTC)
  • Hallo Hedwig, das Bot-Flag habe ich gerade entfernt, jetzt bleibt nur noch die Frage, wie ich beide Seiten schützen soll: Für "autoconfirmed users" oder für alle Benutzer? Liebe Grüße, -- JCIV (Besprekings | Bydraes) 18:54, 7 Augustus 2014 (UTC)
Danke sehr! Alle ist wohl besser, ich werde den Bot so schnell nicht wieder in Betrieb nehmen. Vielen Dank!! --Hedwig in Washington (kontak) 23:57, 7 Augustus 2014 (UTC)
Uitgevoer Uitgevoer - Erledigt. Bei Bedarf einfach wieder melden. Liebe Grüße von Berlin nach Washington. -- JCIV (Besprekings | Bydraes) 00:52, 8 Augustus 2014 (UTC)

Vagobot[wysig bron]

  • Operator  : Vago
  • Automatic or Manually Assisted : automatic, manual
  • Programming Language(s)  : Python (pywikipedia), daily update
  • Function Summary  : Interwiki, redirect
  • Already has a bot flag (Y/N)  : Yes, DE, EN, +29 wikis
  • Function Details  : just using the standard interwiki.py; parameters: -auto -all - log -catr, no experiments!
  • Willing to assist with other tasks, if possible.

Vago (kontak) 12:00, 3 Oktober 2011 (UTC)

* Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Toetswysigings lyk goed. Die robot kan goedgekeur word. Groete. Anoniem

Minsbot[wysig bron]

  • Bot: Minsbot
  • Operator: Ha98574
  • Language: Python
  • Source: interwiki.py, Pywikipediabot
  • Function: Only for interwiki
  • Auto/Manual: Auto
  • Already has a bot flag: 5+, ar, en, fr, it, nl
  • This bot is operated only for interwiki. --Min's (kontak) 02:37, 20 Desember 2011 (UTC)
* Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Toetswysigings lyk goed. Die robot kan goedgekeur word. Groete. Anoniem

Done. The bot is approved by meta. See meta:Steward requests/Bot status/2012-01#Minsbot@af.wikipedia. -- Min's (kontak) 04:45, 13 Januarie 2012 (UTC)

Addihockey10 (automated)[wysig bron]

MahdiBot[wysig bron]

done ~ 40 edits trail.thanks/--Mahdiz (kontak) 05:39, 23 Junie 2012 (UTC)

SteenthIWbot[wysig bron]

--Steenth (kontak) 09:10, 11 Oktober 2012 (UTC)

Fluxbot[wysig bron]

xaosflux Talk 14:22, 3 Julie 2017 (UTC)
3 example edits here. Note, there are <1000 of these detected on afwiki right now, however some impact Tuisblad which is what I ran across today. — xaosflux Talk 14:29, 3 Julie 2017 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Gekant: volgens Kategorie:Pages using invalid self-closed HTML tags is daar slegs 20 geaffekteerde bladsye. M.i. kan hierdie gevalle handmatig reggemaak word en word goedkeuring vir 'n robot, wie se aksies deur 'n mens nagegaan moet word, nie geregverdig nie. Adriaan Joubert (kontak) 16:17, 3 Julie 2017 (UTC)

User:Adriaan Joubert This category does not update fast. Not all the problems show in the category. I update these every week or two on other projects and am willing to do so here as well. — xaosflux Talk 18:01, 3 Julie 2017 (UTC)
(Vertaal deur google: Hierdie kategorie werk nie vinnig op nie. Nie al die probleme wys in die kategorie nie. Ek werk dit elke week of twee op ander projekte en is ook bereid om dit ook hier te doen.)xaosflux Talk 18:01, 3 Julie 2017 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Responsible bot users that is registered and operating on several wikipedias. Will save me from having to do it with my bot. Regards. Frank (kontak) 18:32, 3 Julie 2017 (UTC)

Bot flag granted. Frank (kontak) 19:36, 4 Julie 2017 (UTC)

KabouterBot[wysig bron]

  • Robot: Gebruiker:KabouterBot
  • Bevelvoerder: Adriaan Joubert
  • Outomaties of handmatig: outomaties (met oorsig)
  • Taal: Python
  • Bronkode: m:pywikipedia
  • Funksie: Spoor stukkende eksterne skakels op (bediener reageer met 404), kyk of skakel geargiveer is op Wayback Machine, en indien wel, plaas nota op besprekingsblad dat stukkende eksterne skakel vervang kan word met skakel na geargiveerde weergawe.
  • Het reeds robotvlag: Nee.

KabouterBot (kontak) 20:02, 5 Julie 2017 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Wees net versigtig, daai bot lewer vals-positiewe resultate (dis hoekom ek dit uitgekommentaar het). Gebruik asb onder streng toesig. Frank (kontak) 08:48, 6 Julie 2017 (UTC)
  • Uitgevoer Uitgevoer – Groete. -- SpesBona 11:45, 7 Augustus 2017 (UTC)

DangerezBot[wysig bron]

Kommentaar[wysig bron]

Ek sal baie graag eers in die sandboks wil eksperimenteer.--MickeyDangerez (kontak) 12:59, 31 Augustus 2017 (UTC)

Stem[wysig bron]

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Gekant Mickey, jou spelling is nie goed nie. Ek dink nie dat robotstatus vir jou werk aan spelling 'n goeie idee is nie. (Ek is onseker of robotwerk aan spelling oor die algemeen só hanteer moet word, maar dit is 'n aparte bespreking.) Slyp gerus jou skryfvaardighede en maak seker dat jy op datum is met die AWS en dat jy 'n speltoetser in jou blaaier gebruik. Maar voordat die spelling nie met rasse skrede verbeter nie, sal ek nie hierdie aansoek kan steun nie. Die spelfoute in jou aansoek hierbo is nogal ironies. Ek wil jou ook aanmoedig om net eers meer vertroud te raak met meer aspekte van die projek. Iemand wat 'n robot beheer behoort 'n redelike insig van die naamruimtes, projekkonvensies, wikitaal, ens. te hê. Groete, Alias (kontak) 19:19, 31 Augustus 2017 (UTC)
Ek is wel baie bevoeg met Python-programmering, en wil juis die bot gebruik om my te help met my spelling en ook artikel wat na gegaan moet word vir taal gebruik. Ek het nie toegang tot speltoetser op my blaaier nie. Indien my versoek nie goedgekeur gaan word nie gaan ek nog voort gaan met my ontwikkeling vanaf buite Wikipedia. Ek het bot status benodig om met my bot ontwikkelling te begin en die tegnologie bevorder maar ek word eerder oor my taalgebruik aangevat. Dankie vir jou inset.-MickeyDangerez (kontak) 19:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Ek wil graag ander aspekte van robotte ook mee eksperimenteer en is nie net gefokus op spelling nie. Dus benodig ek robotstatus vir opvoedkundige doeleindes.--MickeyDangerez (kontak) 19:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Mickey, 'n robotvlaggie is nie nodig om 'n robot te skryf of te gebruik nie. Min of meer al wat die robotvlaggie doen is om wysigings wat daardie rekening/gebruiker/robot maak op sekere plekke by verstek weg te steek (soos bv. by Spesiaal:Onlangse wysigings). Sover ek weet is daar geen verskille in wat die rekening tegnies gesproke kan doen nie. Die vraag is dus of die wysigings by verstek weggesteek moet word of nie. Ek verstaan jou versoek dus so: jy dink jou wysiging aan spelling (of opvoedkundige eksperimente) moet by verstek versteek word by onlangse wysigings. Ek vertrou nie my eie spelling genoeg om my wysigings te versteek nie. As 'n reël word eintlik omtrent niks versteek nie. Vroeër was robotte algemeen vir interwikiskakels, maar hulle is deesdae nie meer nodig nie. Sover ek weet word dit nou in baie beperkte gevalle gebruik wat baie maklik geoutomatiseer kan word. Die verbetering van spelling kan in baie gevalle nie maklik geoutomatiseer word nie. Ongespesifiseerde eksperimente waarvoor ons nie die kode kan nagaan nie, is volgens my min of meer die definisie van wat ons nie deur 'n robot wil toelaat nie. Mens het nie 'n robot of 'n speltoetser in jou blaaier nodig om jou spelling na te gaan nie - jy kan jou teks in enige program inplak met 'n speltoetser om dit daar na te gaan. Hou in gedagte dat die algemene Afrikaanse speltoetser in Firefox, LibreOffice, Linux-stelsels (en deur pyenchant/Hunspell vir Python) nie briljant is nie - dit ondersteun bv. nie samestellings nie, en kort heelwat woorde. Dit is hoekom mens tog nog maar moet oplet na die spelreëls. Jy voel duidelik geaffronteerd oor baie van die terugvoer hier, en dit word geweldig uitputtend om jou te probeer help. Probeer asb. kritiek sien as 'n manier om jou aan die konvensies hier bloot te stel. (Ek besef alles is nie gedokumenteer nie, en mense stem ook nie noodwendig oor alles saam nie.) --Alias (kontak) 19:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
In daardie geval het my robot nie botstatus nodig nie, ek het net die OK nodig gehad om te mag eksperimenteer vir navorsing en moontlike praktiese gebruike. As ek geaffronteerd voorkom is dit slegs omrede ek gevoel het dat jou gekanting teen my navorsing is en nie geweet dit is spesifiek bedoel tenopsigte van botvlag en versteekde veranderinge nie. Ek verkies dat enige veranderinge aangebring word deur die bot sigbaar moet wees. My robot is anders as normalle robotte, hy gebruik 'n blaaier (Chrome) op die selfde wyse as 'n persoon en gebruik nie die API nie. Hy funksioneer op die vlak van 'n persoon en sal nie buitensporige veranderinge maak indien hy los gelaat word nie, maar op die selfde pas as 'n algemene gebruiker sy take verig. Verder beplan ek nie om enige ingeboude speltoetsers te gebruik nie maar met die hulp van die NCHLT Afrikaans Text Corpora. Soos ek vantevore gese het, vir eers gaan hy net kyk vir basiese spelfoute, vir eers sal ek dat hy net raporteer van enige spelfoute wat 'n persoon dan kan nagaan en dan deur gee of hy moet voortgaan met verandering of dit moontlik vals is or alreeds verander is. Ek sal meer ingligting gee soos ek daaraan werk en vordering maak.--MickeyDangerez (kontak) 22:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Ek glo die gebruiker sal woorde opsoek voor hy enige vervangings maak :-) Aan die ander kant is dit regtig nie nodig om vir botstatus te wag nie, mits die bot nou nie honderde bladsy gaan wysig nie. Dit help natuurlik ook om eers die bot se doeltreffendheid te demonstreer. Groete. Frank (kontak) 19:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Baie baie dankie vir jou ondersteuning in my navorsing. Sien asb my boodskap hierbo vir meer inligting oor my beplanning.--MickeyDangerez (kontak) 22:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Besluit[wysig bron]

<uitvoerende besluit hier>

Robotte: 'n risiko?[wysig bron]

Ek is gekant teen bots al is dit dalk bloot dat ek vrees wat ek nie verstaan nie. Myns insiens moet Robotte se werking eers aan almal verduidelik word. Wie beheer die inhoud van die bot se kode byvoorbeeld. Waar hardloop die bot sagteware? Waar word die kode gepubliseer? My mening is dat Robotte 'n risiko inhou waarsonder ons kan klaarkom. --RM 06:52, 6 Junie 2006 (UTC)

As ek hierna kyk dan voel ek my mening is geregverdig. [4] --RM 06:56, 6 Junie 2006 (UTC)

Renier, ek gaan nog verder skryf, en ek kan gerus help verduidelik hoe dinge werk (net te min tyd reg nou). Ek glo daar is gevalle waar 'n robot heel onskadelik kan wees. Ons interwiki-skakels word reeds heel getrou deur 'n (te groot) klomp robotte gedoen. (Dit is in elkgeval sekerlik van die verveligste werk om te met die hand te doen.) Ek deel egter jou vrees vir skade en dinge wat net werk veroorsaak. Ek voel ook dat ons nie te veel robotte moet hê wat gekontroleer moet word nie. Meeste robotte oor die wikipediaprojekte glo ek gebruik die pywikipedia-raamwerk wat sekerlik veilig is. Ons kan dalk vereis dat mense die kode publiseer as dit nie die standaardraamwerk is nie. Dankie vir die terugvoer. Ons moet sommer gou probeer om 'n voorlopige beleid op te stel. --Alias 08:59, 6 Junie 2006 (UTC)

Zin en onzin van robots[wysig bron]

Robots zijn een goed hulpmiddel om werk uit te voeren waar weinig denkwerk voor nodig is. Het gevaar van robots is dat ze niet kunnen denken en dus fouten maken.

Mijn ideeën over robots zijn als volgt:

  • Een robot moet altijd handmatig bediend worden. Autonome robots zijn ongewenst.
    • Reden: Een autonome robot kan niet denken en maakt fouten.
  • Een robot moet vertrouwd worden. Een robot heeft een meester nodig om hem te bedienen, de meester moet ook vertrouwd zijn.
    • Reden: De werking van de robot moet gecontroleerd worden door zijn meester, indien iemand een robot verkeerd bediend ontstaan fouten.
  • Een robot mag maximaal één taak per rekening uitvoeren. Een interwikibot gebruikt dus een andere rekening dan een speltoetsrobot, ook al worden beiden door dezelfde meester bediend.
    • Reden: Het feit dat één robot goed werkt betekent niet dat de andere goed werkt.

Een robot die een robotvlaggetje wil krijgen, moet aan alle drie voorwaarden hierboven voldoen, alsook:

  • Er bestaat geen reden om de wijziging in de onlangse wijzigingen te zien.

Een interwikirobot kan ongezien zijn werk doen. Een speltoetsrobot wat mij betreft niet, er is geen reden waarom dit onzichtbaar moet gebeuren. Danielm 16:24, 28 Augustus 2006 (UTC)

Beleidvorming[wysig bron]

Hier is nou soveel versoeke vir robotstatus, maar niemand lig 'n vinger om te help goedkeur / afkeur nie. Persoonlik is ek nie mal oor die situasie nie. Ek dink ons het nou al meer robotte as mense en ek wil nie my vertroue so dun moet versprei nie (ek het nie baie vertroue vir mense wat nie Afrikaans ken en geen rede het om versigtig te wees met hulle wysigings hier nie). Robotoperateurs voer aan dat hulle op so veel moontlik projekte moet werk ter wille van doeltreffendheid. Persoonlik irriteer 'n daaglikse opdatering van interwiki's my en ek sou graag daar sonder wou gaan of dit aansienlik wou verminder. Dit is vir my sinneloos om selfs net vier keer per maand 'n interwiki tussen 'n leë af.wp-datumbladsy en 'n leë datumbladsy by agter-oos-oesbekistani te maak. Hierdie maak artikelgeskiedenis en die onlangse wysigings baie minder bruikbaar. Hoe sal ons te werk gaan om te verseker dat die robotte slegs vír ons werk sonder om onredelik te wees teenoor operateurs met goeie bedoelings? Hoe gaan ons maak sodat die gemeenskap besluit waneeer ons robotstatus toestaan? Ek is bloot die uitvoerende arm van die gemeenskap - toekenning van hierdie regte is tog nie my besluit nie. --Alias 09:45, 5 Junie 2007 (UTC)

Ek was nie bewus daarvan dat lede kon help met die goedkeuring/afkeuring van robotte nie, maar was onder die indruk dat dit 'n taak was wat die administrateurs op hulle skouers geneem het.
Ek sal meer gaan lees oor Robotte en kyk wat ander Wikipedia's se ervaring met hulle was, asook miskien hul ervaring met die spesifieke robotte wat hier botstatus wil hê. Anrie 11:06, 5 Junie 2007 (UTC)
Enige persoon wat daarin belangstel, die en:Wikipedia:Bot_policy se riglyne is baie nuttig om mens 'n idee van die voor- en nadele van robotte te gee. Wat vir my baie sin maak is die volgende deel: Bot operators must be reasonably familiar with the languages that they are linking from and to, in order to confirm that interwiki linkings between the two encyclopedias are done correctly.
Ek het meermale inkorrekte interwikiskakels moes korrigeer wat daar geplaas is deur 'n bot of 'n persoon wat 'n verkeerde vertaling begaan het. Wat die riglyne noem, wat 'n goeie idee is, is dat, wanneer 'n iemand aansoek doen om botstatus, hulle ook die volgende meld:
1. Whether the bot is manually assisted (run by a human) or automatically scheduled to run
2. The period, if any, we should expect it to run
3. What language or program it is running
4. Its purpose
Dit is 'n goeie idee om dan miskien 'n proeftydperk toe te ken, waarin die bot se gedrag beoordeel kan word. Soos Alias terreg noem, die veranderings in interwiki's is hier groottendeels onnodig wanneer dit plaasvind tussen (byna) leë bladsydatums.
Die Engelse riglyne sê ook uitdruklik dat geen bot nie gehardloop mag word voor botstatus toegeken is nie, wat ek dink 'n baie goeie idee is. Anrie 11:18, 5 Junie 2007 (UTC)

About the advantage of having many interwiki bots[wysig bron]

You should not compare the number of interwiki bots to the local number of articles and users but to the overall number of articles in all Wikipedias. The bots follows interwiki links from all languages to all languages, and after all referenced pages have been collected, they will update those with missing or wrong links. For that process to be efficient it is best if the bots can edit in as many languages as possible.

Besides there are differences in the way the bots work. Where they start, how the articles are selected, and whether they run automatically (and thus may have to skip when more than one link is found to the same language) or as mine run manually assisted so the operator may (or may not) be able to solve the found interwiki conflicts.

As I see it, you will by allowing use of interwiki bots improve both your own Wikipedia by quicker update of interwiki links, and all Wikipedias by more efficient use of the resources - specially if a bot is able to solve an interwiki conflict so the next bot can save many fetches of wrong pages. Byrial 10:34, 29 Junie 2007 (UTC)

Especially for the smaller Wikipedias, we observe that editors very often set outgoing interwiki links but fail to add incoming ones to foreign wikipedias. Thus, unless a bot starts from their wiki, these interwiki links are never detected and never get propagated anywhere. In other words, we need interwiki bots starting from every Wikipedia. --Purodha 13:31, 4 Februarie 2008 (UTC)
I agree. Whilst I generally place at least an interwiki link to any Afrikaans pages that I create on one of the corresponding large wikipedia articles, I certainly don't do it on all the others and rely entirely on bots to propagate the interwiki links further., Would your robot pick up cases where the are interwwiki links from the Afrikaans page but none from anywhere else? I have been working on a number of en:Template:Country data XXX / Sjabloon:Landdata XXX templates where bot assistance could be useful. See for example Sjabloon:Landdata Sint Helena which has a link to the English template en:Template:Country data Saint Helena which currently has nothing pointing back. I could do this one manually, but I am rather loath to do the same for the other 200 odd cases. laurens 07:04, 17 Februarie 2008 (UTC)
As for my bot it was not very likely to detect this case since (a) it starts usually from the Wikipedia of Ripuarian languages (Keulsj, etc.) and (b) I need a hint to point it to any other starting point of interest. This needs to be done manually. I do so, when I know of any such starting point. Just write on my talk page if you have suggestions. --Purodha 17:01, 20 Maart 2008 (UTC)
Op dit moment zijn er veel interwiki fouten op af.wikipedia en dat groeit steeds meer. De ideale situatie dat er evenveel iw bots actief zijn hier als er verschillende talen wiki's zijn. En dat elke bot een andere taal wiki als start punt heeft. Maar dan nog steeds zijn er nog interwiki bots met hun eigenaren nodig om de iw conflicten handmatige op te lossen vanuit hun kennis van steden of planten. Want planten en dieren zijn zeer lastig om goed de iw conflicten op te lossen. Carsrac (kontak) 07:05, 23 Mei 2008 (UTC)

If wanted, I can run my bot starting from af.wikipedia. --EivindJ (kontak) 08:48, 23 Mei 2008 (UTC)

Global bots[wysig bron]

Hello. The standard bot policy was updated to allow global bots, which are now technically possible. These are trusted bots that will be given bot access on every wiki that allows global bots (the local policy or request page must explicitly allow them, or they won't get access on this wiki). The current requirements for global bots are:

  • a global bot must only maintain interlanguage links or fix double-redirects;
  • a global bot must have already been active on several wikis, with long-term contributions demonstrating its trustworthiness.

Does anyone object to allowing global bots on this wiki? I'll update the local policy in a week if there are no objections. Thanks. Carsrac (kontak) 05:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Ondersteun. Goeie idee! Groete. Frank (kontak) 02:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
    • Global bot policy is active also for this wiki Carsrac (kontak) 16:52, 1 Oktober 2008 (UTC)
      • Wonderlik, baie dankie! Groete. Anoniem

Remove bot flag of User:Egmontbot[wysig bron]

Please remove my old account's bot flag. Egmontaz is my old account. Verification of this claim here: [5]. Thank you in advance! Ah3kal (kontak) 13:45, 16 Desember 2014 (UTC)

Uitgevoer Uitgevoer - Best regards, -- JCIV (Besprekings | Bydraes) 19:46, 16 Desember 2014 (UTC)