Gaan na inhoud

Gebruikerbespreking:Morne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Nuwe onderwerp
in Wikipedia, die vrye ensiklopedie
Jongste opmerking: 1 jaar gelede deur MGA73 in onderwerp GFDL
Argief
2006–2010 2011–2016 2017–2018
2019–2024
Hoe word 'n argief aangelê?
Meesterredakteur IV
(17 jaar, 88 646)
Toegeken deur Aliwal2012

GFDL

[wysig bron]
Why GFDL is not a good license for media files

Hello! You have uploaded some files licensed GFDL with disclaimers (Onderhewig aan vrywarings). You can see the files clicking this link. Disclaimers is not considered to be a good thing per en:Wikipedia:GFDL standardization. So if you are the copyright holder please consider to remove the disclaimers (Change the license template from GFDL-with-disclaimers to GFDL).

GFDL is generally not a good license for photos etc. so if the files are not already dual licensed with cc-by-sa-3.0 or 4.0 please also consider to add cc-by-sa-4.0. MGA73 (kontak) 15:31, 4 Oktober 2024 (UTC)Beantwoord